We’ve all known how a handful of software geeks and inventive startups transformed Silicon Valley into the world’s high-tech Mecca. Yet, when giants clash, the tremors are felt far beyond the Californian heartland. The latest seismic shift comes courtesy of Instagram’s new sensation, Threads, and Twitter, the long-reigning sovereign of real-time public conversations.
On the surface, the narrative is clear – Threads, within the span of a mere 16 hours, accumulated a staggering 30 million downloads, blitzing past any known record and irking the Twitter monolith enough to trigger legal threats. Yet, underneath, this is a tale of a burgeoning feud in the tech world, a clash of Silicon Valley titans – Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, and an audience yearning for a genuine Twitter alternative.
It all started when Zuckerberg, the Meta CEO, pushed the launch button for Threads on Wednesday. The app saw two million downloads in the first two hours. Fast forward to the following morning, the app’s download tally had surged to 30 million, marking a new high in the annals of app launches.
In just one day, Threads had seized the throne as the most rapidly downloaded app ever, outpacing its predecessors, including ChatGPT, the AI-powered chatbot from OpenAI. The thirst for a Twitter rival was palpable as Threads drew in Twitter’s high-profile users such as Ellen DeGeneres, Bill Gates, Shakira, and Oprah Winfrey. The enthusiasm was contagious, and Zuckerberg, buoyed by the app’s meteoric rise, couldn’t help but claim, “Feels like the beginning of something special.”
However, the rise of Threads was not well received in all quarters. The rivalry grew heated as Twitter, under the stewardship of billionaire Elon Musk, accused Meta of misappropriating trade secrets and threatened legal action. Twitter’s lawyers asked Meta to preserve internal documents relevant to the dispute, alleging that Meta had used insider information from former Twitter employees to develop Threads. “Competition is fine, cheating is not,” Musk tweeted, further fueling the feud.
Threads was a much-needed hit for Meta, which has been battling accusations of spreading misinformation and other online toxicities. With the successful launch of Threads, the company had a brief respite from regulatory scrutiny and public ire. While the jubilation within Meta was palpable, external voices cautioned against conflating early momentum with long-term success. Threads may have a great start, but Twitter, with its 237 million daily users, still holds a significant lead.
The new app also sparked discussions about data privacy. Some Threads users have voiced their concerns about the requirement to delete their connected Instagram account to get rid of their Threads account. Instagram has said it is seeking alternative ways for Threads users to deactivate their accounts.
Moreover, in its bid to create a “friendly” platform for conversations, Threads obscured some posts deemed misleading by independent fact-checkers. It also hid comments entirely under certain circumstances, sparking debate about the extent and limits of content moderation.
Regardless of the controversies, Threads is certainly shaking up the social media landscape. Its rise, amid Twitter’s challenges and the growing thirst for a viable alternative, embodies the dynamism and unpredictability of Silicon Valley. Yet, as Kate Stone, a new Threads user, said, “I read about Threads, and I don’t like Zuckerberg very much, but I saw it was easy to do if you have an Instagram account. So I thought I’d give it a try.” The question now is whether Threads will be able to maintain this momentum, or if it’s just a passing fad in the ever-changing tech world. Only time will tell.
Click on this link to read this article in French version