The familiar glow of the moon that graces our night skies has a more mysterious past than we once believed. The iconic Apollo 17 mission, which brought back rock samples from the lunar surface, has given us a deeper look into the origins of our closest celestial neighbor.
Long-held beliefs suggest that about 4.5 billion years ago, Theia, a colossal object nearly the size of Mars, collided with a young Earth. The fiery debris from this cataclysmic event eventually formed the Moon. However, there have always been uncertainties about the exact timing of these events.
An ancient crystal reveals more
At the heart of this discovery is an atom-by-atom examination of a 4.46-billion-year-old lunar crystal. This new analysis indicates that the moon’s molten state solidified at least 40 million years earlier than previously thought, a revelation published in the journal Geochemical Perspectives Letters.
Commenting on the significance of this finding, Jennika Greer, a cosmochemist at the University of Glasgow, said, “It pushes back the minimum age of the moon formation.” She emphasized the importance of continued exploration, noting, “this is the oldest age to date. It doesn’t mean we now know the age of the moon and we should stop looking.”
Understanding Lunar Zircon Crystals
Lunar zircon crystals serve as essential chronometers that help scientists peer into the moon’s ancient history. When the Moon began to take shape, it was enveloped in a seething ocean of magma. These zircon crystals formed as this molten sea began to cool and harden.
These crystals have an intriguing property: they absorb radioactive uranium, which gradually decays into lead. By analyzing the relationship between different forms of lead and uranium isotopes in these crystals, scientists can estimate their age.
A controversial find
In 2021, a groundbreaking research paper by cosmochemists Bidong Zhang and Audrey Bouvier proposed that some lunar zircon crystals could be a staggering 4.46 billion years old. This claim was met with skepticism and sparked intense debate within the scientific community.
Reflecting on the challenges they faced during their initial submission, Bidong Zhang shared that their findings were initially met with criticism. He noted, “Apollo rocks were very consistent at 4.3 billion years old. That’s why people are like: “Why would this age be different?”“
To address this skepticism, Greer and her team used a method known as atom probe tomography. This technique allowed them to meticulously analyze the crystal, ensuring that the lead atoms hadn’t accumulated into clusters that could skew the age estimate.
The broader implications
The newly unearthed data suggest a puzzling discrepancy in the ages of lunar rock samples. While this lunar zircon crystal dates back 4.46 billion years, other rock types suggest a timeline of about 4.35 billion years. This discrepancy has led scientists to question our basic understanding of the Moon’s evolution.
Planetary scientist Benjamin Weiss of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology commented on the importance of future lunar missions, noting that recovering more samples could provide invaluable insights into the moon’s past.
Philipp Heck, curator of meteoritic and polar studies at the Field Museum, expressed his awe at the unfolding lunar revelations, noting, “Fifty one years ago, no one would have thought that we would one day analyze these lunar samples with this new, cutting-edge method.”
In the quest to unravel the mysteries of our universe, the Moon continues to intrigue and inspire. As technology advances, so too will our understanding of this enigmatic celestial body, a constant reminder of the wonders that lie beyond our world.
Click on this link to read this article in French version